Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Journalism > Journalism Drudge > Re: Pentagon Co...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 5 Topic 56 of 137
Post > Topic >>

Re: Pentagon Confirms Explosives Left Open And Unguarded

by "political commentator" <political.commentator@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 29, 2004 at 08:11 PM

"Acting Like Zepp" <zepp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:SzBgd.21002$NC6.8107@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "John Slade" <hitman86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:kDugd.2136$zx1.948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>        As the Pentagon tried to spin this explosive scandal with a
press
>> briefing, they only provide more questions rather than answers. In one
>> moment they were asked that if the place was secured after they knew
>> explosives were there, the answer was no. An ammunition specialist 
>> claimed
>> they arrived at the facility and there were no US troops guarding the
>> explosives. Apparently the facility was left guarded for three whole 
>> days.
>> The specialist says he was there three days after troops initially got
to
>> the site. There is no amount of spin Bush can put on this that will hid

>> the
>> fact that there were not enough troops there.
>
>
> ah, but does it prove there were explosives of the sort claimed ther
when 
> the troops arrived?
>
> and just exactly how could such an operation - the removal of so many
tons 
> of stuff - have happened in any organized fa****on in the wake of the
army 
> sweeping through Iraq and scattering the Iraqi military to the four
winds?
>
> are you saying the terrorists wee already in Iraq, already highly 
> organized, and were able to move everything out in a couple of days 
> unnoticed?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>
>


MUST READ:

Update 2: Latest news on Bulgegate, story evolving fast


''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
The BULGEGATE story is evolving faster by the day.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Don't know the story? Get up to speed:

President Bush had a RECTANGULAR bulge on his back. Its been called 
"Bulgegate" and the "The Bush Bulge" and it has appeared in all the of the

2004 Presidential debates. It has also appeared in photos not related to
the 
debates.  Now two wires have appeared and, as of today, no explanation has

been offered for that. The "bulge" has been called a "badly tailored
****rt" 
by the President -the same ****rt in all 3 debates, mind you.

Rather than following up on the "3 bad ****rts theory", it seems the media 
accepts the President has a wardrobe full of them. Do we have a
transmitter, 
defibrillator, Wireless IV device, or something else?

Is there a wire or a health problem (Busk skipped his physical, even 
mentioned he was healthy in the debates).

Does he need an earpiece to debate 'his own' policies?



The "Seinfeld Democracy"
--------------------------------------------------------


- Who's that man with the box on his back?

- Oh, that's our president.

- What is it?

- We don't know. I mean -- we may or may not be able to know.

------------------------------------------------------------



''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
In the last 48 hours we have the following developments:
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Salon.com has published an article on the same day I published an article 
which points out photo enhancements and exposes a wire leading from the 
bulge on the President's back.

Read both accounts here:

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/29/bulge/index_np.html
http://bulgegate.blogspot.com/
(test the theory for yourself!)

Puppetstring has been updated with a comment I grabbed from Colin Green
at:

http://www.journalscape.com/Colin/2004-10-29-11:02

"
If we follow this theory through the bulge would be the receiver/relayer, 
the wire up the right shoulder is to an inductance loop, perhaps in his 
collar, and it also looks to me that there is a wire travelling down his 
back, which would correspond to the wire seen behind his tie. This wire
that 
we can see is actually quite prominent by way of its thickness, say 5mm. 
Such thickness would only normally be used to convey power - from a
battery 
pack somewhere on his person, to the receiver on his back. Also note that 
the tie wire disappears into the left hand side of Bush's jacket - the
same 
side as the wire seen down his lower back.
"
Goto and scroll to the bottom:

http://puppetstring.blogspot.com/2004/10/was-there-wire-behind-that-tie_23.html#comments


......................................

Cannonfire has been very busy also, saying that "I have just received 
private word from someone in a position to know that a former president
also 
used a "wire," in much the same way alleged in the case of G.W. Bush."

Read more here: 
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2004/10/presidential-precedent-new-info.html

......................................

At BushWired you can get an even more detailed account of all the news and

see new photographic evidence posted today:

http://bushwired.blogspot.com/2004/10/few-fresh-updates-official-debunking.html#comments



....................................................

We close with a comment from another bulge follower:


"

I've had a lot of people say -- "There's so many other policy issues to
talk 
about."

I explain to them that -- Just because it's not a policy issue, doesn't
mean 
it's not im****tant.  Health and leader****p ability is just as im****tant
for 
the electorate.
....

Also, a lot of people say -- "Why are you guys so angry about this?"
....

To combat this apathy about this story, I said:

Never have the lies been so obvious. Never has the lack of integrity in
the 
mainstream media been so clear.
....

This "bulge" issue is symbolic of what American politics and democracy has

become.

A joke.
....

I'm hoping that something this blatantly obvious will get Americans to
start 
thinking about the state in which the country is in.

1000's of people died for a war partly because the media didn't do it's
job 
and re****t the whole truth.

Here, we have only ONE truth. A simple truth. Perhaps a very im****tant
truth 
about the character or health of a President. It's being hidden -- and the

President thinks we're fools!

It's uncluttered from politics -- you just need 2 eyes.

And yet the President says 2 + 2 = 5 and the U.S. media says, "Yes sir, it

is!"

"


'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Something to remember: 
http://img44.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img44&image=badtailor.jpg
READ MORE HERE:

http://www.bushwired.blogspot.com/
http://www.bushbulge.com/
(send an automatic letter to the media)
http://www.puppetstring.blogspot.com/
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/
http://bulgegate.blogspot.com/
http://isbushwired.com/
....
http://politicalcommentator.blogspot.com/
....
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Pentagon Confirms Explosives Left Open And Unguarded
"John Slade" &l  2004-10-29 16:56:48 
Re: Pentagon Confirms Explosives Left Open And Unguarded
"Acting Like Zepp&qu  2004-10-29 10:57:03 
Re: Pentagon Confirms Explosives Left Open And Unguarded
"John Slade" &l  2004-10-29 18:05:12 
Re: Pentagon Confirms Explosives Left Open And Unguarded
"Acting Like Zepp&qu  2004-10-29 17:04:13 
Re: Pentagon Confirms Explosives Left Open And Unguarded
"political commentat  2004-10-29 20:11:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 23 16:04:51 CDT 2008.