Re: Iranian Parliament OKs Nuke Enrichment Bill

John Slade wrote:

>       As we see what's happening in Iran with nuclear proliferation,
> we also see what our choice of President should be. Bush has not said
> one thing about Iran in months. They have been saying they have a
> right to produce enriched uranium. However Bush has said nothing
> about this problem in his speeches. Could it be because this
> situation in Iran makes him look really bad? Bush claimed one of the
> main reasons that he invaded Iraq was because if it's nuclear weapons
> program. Bush knew then that Iraq did not have a nuclear program.
> However everyone knew about Iran's nuclear ambitions. Bush basically
> ignored Iran's nuclear program and has said nothing about it for
> months.
>
>     This is a clear reason why we need to have John Kerry as President
> rather than Bush. Bush is only able to focus on one thing at a time.
> This is a very bad trait for a President who must guard us against
> numerous threats from every corner of the earth. We don't want the
> evidence that Bush can't multitask to be a mushroom cloud over New
> York or San Francisco. That's why we can't afford to have a President
> who has systematically ignored the REAL and growing nuclear threats
> in North Korea and Iran.
>
> John

After the vote, some of the Iranian lawmakers started chanting "Death to
America."  And Iran is for Bush.  ROFL!

-- 
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"