On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:56:04 GMT, "John Slade" <hitman86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Boy Matt Drudge the famous muckraker loves to dig up dirt on
people,
>well some people. We heard Matt Drudge perpetuate the story of Kerry and
an
>affair that turned out to be false. However when someone of not admits to
>helping Bush dodge the draft, Matt Drudge doesn't have a headline about
it.
>
> Way back in May, James Barnes a former Speaker of the Texas House,
said
>he helped Bush jump over hundreds of names to get service in the National
>Guard. The purpose of this was to avoid service in Vietnam. This
interview
>was done in May however there was not much press about it. Now the story
is
>getting into the mainstream press.
>
> That's why I'm here. Why would Matt Drudge who claims to be a
>journalist re****t on stories on Kerry that have no basis in fact but
ignore
>stories about Bush that have a lot of evidence to back them up? It's
clear
>to me that Matt Drudge is not a journalist but another propaganda wing of
>the Bush party. It's a damned shame to see journalists turned into
political
>****lls. Matt Drudge should never call himself a journalist.
>
>John
>
I find this interesting, Drudge digs up **** on everybody--he is a
journalist., but only when he digs up **** on people you don't like,
a Few months ago, every far left nut was saying go to his site, (can't
remember why now)_, but it was against the right wing--you far lefty's
were all over it, now again he says something you don't like--you say
Matt Drudge should never call himself a journalist.
How shallow of you far lefty's
I am a Democrat, only started to pay some attention to Drudge when he
criticized the right wing, shows me he was fair--I don't always agree
with him, but he is a journalist even if you don't agree with him.
|
