Re: Pentagon Confirms Explosives Left Open And Unguarded
by "John Slade" <hitman86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Oct 29, 2004 at 06:05 PM
"Acting Like Zepp" <zepp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:SzBgd.21002$NC6.8107@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "John Slade" <hitman86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:kDugd.2136$zx1.948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > As the Pentagon tried to spin this explosive scandal with a
press
> > briefing, they only provide more questions rather than answers. In one
> > moment they were asked that if the place was secured after they knew
> > explosives were there, the answer was no. An ammunition specialist
claimed
> > they arrived at the facility and there were no US troops guarding the
> > explosives. Apparently the facility was left guarded for three whole
days.
> > The specialist says he was there three days after troops initially got
to
> > the site. There is no amount of spin Bush can put on this that will
hid
> > the
> > fact that there were not enough troops there.
>
>
> ah, but does it prove there were explosives of the sort claimed ther
when
> the troops arrived?
The video shows that large amounts of explosives were there five days
after the ammunition guys moved ammunition and explosives. The dump was
unguarded didn't you hear him say that nobody was there to guard the place
when they arrived. You were paying attention weren't you?
John