"John Slade" <hitman86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:sDvgd.2184$zx1.1672@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Acting Like Zepp" <zepp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:SzBgd.21002$NC6.8107@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "John Slade" <hitman86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:kDugd.2136$zx1.948@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > As the Pentagon tried to spin this explosive scandal with a
>> > press
>> > briefing, they only provide more questions rather than answers. In
one
>> > moment they were asked that if the place was secured after they knew
>> > explosives were there, the answer was no. An ammunition specialist
> claimed
>> > they arrived at the facility and there were no US troops guarding the
>> > explosives. Apparently the facility was left guarded for three whole
> days.
>> > The specialist says he was there three days after troops initially
got
> to
>> > the site. There is no amount of spin Bush can put on this that will
hid
>> > the
>> > fact that there were not enough troops there.
>>
>>
>> ah, but does it prove there were explosives of the sort claimed ther
when
>> the troops arrived?
>
>
> The video shows that large amounts of explosives were there five days
> after the ammunition guys moved ammunition and explosives. The dump was
> unguarded didn't you hear him say that nobody was there to guard the
place
> when they arrived. You were paying attention weren't you?
and WHAT was there? Can YOU tell from that video exactly what kinds of
explosives are there? And how much?
Nope - you cant. You dont know, cBS and the NYT dont know, no one knows.
Yet
you state with certainty that there were 380 tons of a partuclar kind of
explosive that were moved.
Oh wait - that's right - there was an announcement today from one of the
terrorist groups that they took the stuff and are using it. I guess tat
answers the question.
>
> John
>
>
|
