When Do We Invade? Re: Iranian Parliament OKs Nuke Enrichment Bill

John Slade wrote:
> 
>       As we see what's happening in Iran with nuclear proliferation, we
also
> see what our choice of President should be. Bush has not said one thing
> about Iran in months. They have been saying they have a right to produce
> enriched uranium. However Bush has said nothing about this problem in
his
> speeches. Could it be because this situation in Iran makes him look
really
> bad? Bush claimed one of the main reasons that he invaded Iraq was
because
> if it's nuclear weapons program. Bush knew then that Iraq did not have a
> nuclear program. However everyone knew about Iran's nuclear ambitions.
Bush
> basically ignored Iran's nuclear program and has said nothing about it
for
> months.
> 
>     This is a clear reason why we need to have John Kerry as President
> rather than Bush. Bush is only able to focus on one thing at a time.
This is
> a very bad trait for a President who must guard us against numerous
threats
> from every corner of the earth. We don't want the evidence that Bush
can't
> multitask to be a mushroom cloud over New York or San Francisco. That's
why
> we can't afford to have a President who has systematically ignored the
REAL
> and growing nuclear threats in North Korea and Iran.

Now now, don't draw attention to Duhbya's double standards...

RT