On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:37:07 GMT, "John Slade" <hitman86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Now we have Matt Drudge trying to claim that some voting machines in
>Philly have votes already on them. However, since Drudge didn't "develop"
>the story, he once again gets it wrong. Apparently the machines have two
>counters on them, one that shows the current votes cast and one that
shows
>the number of votes cast in the machine's lifetime. They have been trying
to
>contact Drudge to issue a retraction but Drudge is refusing to take their
>calls.
>
>John
>
I have always maintained the Drudge, aside from being a jackass, is
not a journalist. He is just a guy with the with the most extensive
set of news related boolmarks I have seen. How does providing a link
to other outlets stories make him a journalist?
|
