Re: The deaf, dumb, and blind biofuel cultists have yet another heavy issue to explain away!

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:06:13 -0700 (PDT), Curt
<obadiahlynch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mumbled:

>On Mar 11, 2:04 pm, "gatt" <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Owl Cafe & Filling Station" <et...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:fdsdt3to8cva7327ieqbfkpsv0qmirecus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:59:11 -0700, "gatt" <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> > mumbled:
>>
>> >>As usual.   The talk show hosts, political journalists and
politicians
>> >>should just STFU about biofuel.
>>
>> > Why?
>>
>> > If you really want it to happen you would understand that raising
>> > awareness is key.
>>
>> I didn't make my point clearly there.  I meant to say, the should stop
>> criticizing biofuel research.  As in the old example of the IBM
executive
>> ridiculing the idea of a personal computer, criticizing research never
got
>> anything built.
>
>We shouldn't be criticizing it. But I'm not so sure we should be
>subsidizing corn ethanol. That there, that's a scam.

Nope.

It's a transition until cellulosic and switchgrass gets going.

>The Brazilians can make it work. 

Cane sugar has a higher energy content. We need to plant sugar beets.