Re: The deaf, dumb, and blind biofuel cultists have yet another heavy issue to explain away!

In article <7nTBj.7383$hr3.1456@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
> Of course there are some trade-offs.... but the comparison is minimal,
> and one step at a time in addressing those issues with dependence on
> oil, the rising costs of gasoline and pollution being the primary task.

      Well if pollution is one of the primary tasks, then I can 
certainly see why you would want to go electrical, especially in the 
coal-fired midwest. Minimally trade off smoke and particulates and 
carbon even more smoke, particulates and carbon PLUS mercury and sulfur 
dioxide. Works for me.