Re: The deaf, dumb, and blind biofuel cultists have yet another heavy issue to explain away!

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:10:16 GMT, Lobby Dosser
<lobby.dosser.mapson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mumbled:

>Owl Cafe & Filling Station <ethyl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:06:13 -0700 (PDT), Curt
>> <obadiahlynch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mumbled:
>> 
>>>On Mar 11, 2:04 pm, "gatt" <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> "Owl Cafe & Filling Station" <et...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>> messagenews:fdsdt3to8cva7327ieqbfkpsv0qmirecus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>
>>>> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:59:11 -0700, "gatt"
>>>> > <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mumbled:
>>>>
>>>> >>As usual.   The talk show hosts, political journalists and
>>>> >>politicians should just STFU about biofuel.
>>>>
>>>> > Why?
>>>>
>>>> > If you really want it to happen you would understand that raising
>>>> > awareness is key.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't make my point clearly there.  I meant to say, the should
>>>> stop criticizing biofuel research.  As in the old example of the IBM
>>>> executive ridiculing the idea of a personal computer, criticizing
>>>> research never got anything built.
>>>
>>>We shouldn't be criticizing it. But I'm not so sure we should be
>>>subsidizing corn ethanol. That there, that's a scam.
>> 
>> Nope.
>> 
>> It's a transition until cellulosic and switchgrass gets going.
>> 
>>>The Brazilians can make it work. 
>> 
>> Cane sugar has a higher energy content. We need to plant sugar beets.
>> 
>
>All wrong! Genome Man Critters beat them all. Free input. Only cost is 
>habitat - tank farm - and output storage - tank farm. And dudes to 
>monitor the process. Same trans****tation and distribution network.

I concur on that, but IF we need a farm subsidy energy industry, beets
beat corn.