Re: The deaf, dumb, and blind biofuel cultists have yet another heavy issue to explain away!

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:34:03 -0400, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
mumbled:

>In article <7nTBj.7383$hr3.1456@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Of course there are some trade-offs.... but the comparison is minimal,
>> and one step at a time in addressing those issues with dependence on
>> oil, the rising costs of gasoline and pollution being the primary task.
>
>      Well if pollution is one of the primary tasks, then I can 
>certainly see why you would want to go electrical, especially in the 
>coal-fired midwest. Minimally trade off smoke and particulates and 
>carbon even more smoke, particulates and carbon PLUS mercury and sulfur 
>dioxide. Works for me.


Oh fer fucks sake, why don't we all just go bicycles and fucking
rickshaws!