Re: The deaf, dumb, and blind biofuel cultists have yet another heavy issue to explain away!

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:49:11 GMT, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)"
<findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mumbled:

>
>"Owl Cafe & Filling Station" <ethyl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> coughed up...
>
>> Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  wrote:
>
>> "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> >> Of course there are some trade-offs.... but the comparison is
minimal,
>> >> and one step at a time in addressing those issues with dependence on
>> >> oil, the rising costs of gasoline and pollution being the primary
task.
>
>> >      Well if pollution is one of the primary tasks, then I can
>> >certainly see why you would want to go electrical, especially in the
>> >coal-fired midwest. Minimally trade off smoke and particulates and
>> >carbon even more smoke, particulates and carbon PLUS mercury
>> >and sulfur dioxide. Works for me.
>
>> Oh fer ****s sake, why don't we all just go bicycles and ****ing
>> rickshaws!
>
>If you work within 5 miles of your place of employment, perhaps
>that makes good sense


You have no clue how our economy works, just none.