On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:14:20 -0400, Reggie <Reggie501@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Just look at their choices. See if you agree. We don't. The Brits must
>have a totally different definition of "Liberal" - and have no clue as
>to who is influential in the US and who is irrelevant. They list Joe
>Lieberman and Chris Matthews as 'liberals' - for starters - and need
>some real help in correcting their political acumen of life across the
>pond. You can ad your own 'most influential' liberal or conservative to
>their list. Go for it.
>
>http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/latest-news-at-a-glance/political-glance
>
>UK - Telegraph article:
>
>The 50 most influential US political pundits
>Monday, 28 April 2008 14:48
>
>With the internet revolution and the growing popularity of cable
>television, the multitude of voices can seem be bewildering and,
>occasionally, deafening.
>
>The Daily Telegraph today unveils its list of the 50 most influential
>political pundits to help readers sort through whose opinions matter.
>These are the people who make voters sit up and take notice. They are
>the ones who political candidates and campaigns are constantly seeking
>to woo and influence. They include television presenters, newspaper
>columnists, bloggers and talking heads.
>
>More...
>
Krugman 48, behind JC Watts? Somebody has to be kidding.
|
