Re: The U.S. can never force other nations to fight for their own freedom, they had to do it by themselves Re: Anti-War Up - Pentagon institute calls Iraq war 'a major debacle'...

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:56:44 -0700, Colin Campbell
<activated_95b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (remove underscore)> wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:23:48 GMT, PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:18:27 -0700, Colin Campbell
>><activated_95b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (remove underscore)> wrote:
>>
>>>In this case you should be able to provide references from reputable
>>>and unbiased sources to sup****t these claims.
>>>
>>>How about explaining why biographies of Saddam and histories of Iraq
>>>indicate no US involvement in Saddam's rise to power?
>>>
>>>You are an example of my point: In order for any of your claims to
>>>make sense you have to believe in them beforehand and cannot approach
>>>the sup****ting evidence in an objective manner.
>>
>>
>>There is no money in writing anything (books)nice or even bad about
>>Saddam.  Fortunately he is contem****ary history.  Go read TIME,
>>NewsWeek and other contem****ary newsmagazines of the day.  You will
>>get a pretty good picture of US perfidy.
>
>If I read Time and Newsweek - I would only get what the editor's felt
>would increase sales.
>
>This is why I prefer historians who are more concerned about a
>reputation for good research than what is currently politically
>popular.
>
ROTFL

Like non-existant chatter on a system you can't even name
properly?

You claiming concern for any sort of accuracy is advanced theater
of the absurd.


Peter Skelton