Drooler wrote:
> Maybe not ...
>
> It's widely believed, now, that the Clintons RECRUITED Jerry Wright
> to sabotage Obama's campaign because:
>
> 1) They KNEW Wright well, and they also knew he was jealous of
> Barack's success. (They invited the Rev. to the White House to
> "counsel" them, post-Monica, remember?)
>
> 2) The Clinton's were aware that the Reverend was pissed off
> because Obama seemed to ignore Wright during the campaign.
>
> It's bitterness at work here in sup****t of the Clinton's perfidy.
Thats the way things have always been done in DC. You wanna get anything
done, and you make enemies. You wanna be as beloved as Obama, dont do
anything that will piss anyone off. Dont do anything but give speeches.
> WE ALL KNOW THAT THE CLINTONS WILL DO AND SAY
> ANYTHING TO GARNER SOME VOTES.
Right. Just ask Barry Goldwater. You gotta get elected first.
> And Bush's **** was quick to hop on McCain's gas-tax bandwagon, wasn't
> she? A real agent for change and originality!
There's a diff. She wants to tax the oil companies directly to use the
money to pay for the highway work. McCain would let those jobs, and that
needed work on the infrastructure go. Remember the MPLS bridge?
|
