Re: NIGEL BROOKS CAN THO MELTON ATTACK - 2ND REBUTTAL

On Sun, 4 May 2008 12:46:47 -0700, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>I told him then it was a typo and I removed the erred post from Google. 
>It appears that Mr. Brooks and SteveL have retrieved yet another one of 
>their forgeries taken directly out of my wastebasket.

So your contention is that we took a "forgery" from *YOUR*
wastebasket. Why that would make it *your* fogery by definition
wouldn't it? Or was that statement another "typo"?

No Doug your original post has reappeared on Google. You want two
dozen links to this post from Google sites all over the world like I
provided for your "I have a Purple Heart"  post?

It will only take 5 minutes. Say the word and I'll bury you in another
avalanche of proof.

In the meantime, please explain how the post can be a "forgery" when
you yourself contend that the original did indeed contain a statement
from you that you had served 30 years in the military - except that it
was a "typo".

In case you hadn't noticed, the two explanations are mutually
exclusive.

> Talk about 
>unethical and fraudulent

Indeed!

>, could any two smear merchants be more obvious 
>that Sp4 Brooks and SteveL/Jim McCulloch?

Just one. Dougie Reiman.

Oh and I'm not Jim McCulloch and have never posted as him. Why do you
persist in trying to make that connection?