"DGVREIMAN" <dgvreiman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:lPmdnYSIlss1j4PVnZ2dnUVZ_v2pnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> NIGEL BROOKS CAN THO MELTON ATTACK - 2ND REBUTTAL
>
> (Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all of
> my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
> contem****ary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
> represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
> about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those
> specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
> entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
> annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please notify me of
> your specific reasons for annoyance via email at legalcoach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
> "reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post,
> or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google archive,
> publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain, and to
present
> articles to USENET readers prior to publication to determine interest,
and
> not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional
harm
> by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself
from
> harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful and
> legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
defamed
> or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not interrupted nor infringed
> upon, I clearly do not have a reason to respond with a rebuttal. Please
> also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web hosts of any
> annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar entity about me
> after I give the offender an op****tunity to retract, apologize and
remove
> said post from the Google archive).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks said I was asleep in my BEQ when the January 13,
> 1969 attacks on the Can Tho Army base and POW camp took place.
Statements
> such as these indicate to me that Sp4 draftee Brooks (two whole years in
> service as a personnel clerk) is sorely unknowledgeable about Can Tho,
the
> 1969 January attack, the US Army, the duties of an NCO, the US Army in
> General, the functions of a base under attack, the functions of a large
> BEQ such as the Melton when such an attack occurs, how the Melton was
> structured, how the defenses for the Melton were organized and placed on
> the outside walkways, entrances and roof top of the Melton, life in
> general in Vietnam for a NCO, especially a Senior NCO housed in a BEQ
> containing hundreds of enlisted men, and just about everything else you
> can imagine about this incident. And I am sure I have left out much that
> Nigel Brooks is clearly clueless about.
I haven't been an E-4 in over 40 years Mr. Reiman - but to get to the
point - exactly what does this long rant have to do with the fact that you
previously claimed that you had witnessed an attack on the Can Tho Army
Air
Field that involved the enemy utilizing two ambulances to gain access to
the
facility. (When I was in Vietnam, stationed in Can Tho I witnessed two
ambulances drive though our main gate, calmly drive to our air****t, drive
on
the tarmac and while driving down the tarmac Viet Cong contained in the
ambulances shot each plane yada yada yada)
http://tinyurl.com/njadt
The fact is that the attack as described by you did not happen.
Rest of irrelevant rant removed...............
> 11. Mr. Brooks Finds Yet Another Discarded Typo!
>
>
>
>
>
> Mr. Brooks said:
>
> "Now - About that claim you spent 30 years in the military and that your
> last
> command was an MI command (http://tinyurl.com/vyrt8).
My investigation
> determined your military service was:
>
> USMC July 21, 1961 - Oct 19, 1961
> US Army June 18, 1962 - January 20, 1970
>
> Whats that about 8-9 years?
>
> My investigation also determined that rather than being an MI command (I
> assume by MI you meant Military Intelligence or I guess you could try
and
> spin the **** out of it and come up with something in MI that matches
> recruiting) - your last assignment was that of a Field Recruiter at
> Lancaster Pennsylvania.
>
> Nigel Brooks
>
> Doug's Rebuttal: First, your post above is a forgery. I removed that
post
> long ago and announced when I did the 30-year bit was a typo. I did
> another search on my name and the phrase "30 years in the military" and
> the post cannot be found on the Google archive. My God Brooks, is this
yet
> ANOTHER discarded typo post you and SteveL have removed from my waste
> basket to try and defame and smear me with? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
>
> Post reference:
>
> <u3ig78sfq9s121@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Mr. Brooks, you have been told several times the "30 years" was a typo.
> And you have also been told that my last assignment as a "Station
> Commander" for a recruiting station dealt with MI issues that involved
> undercover MI agents working in the schools around my Station. The SDS
> were breaking into recruiting offices and doing other nasty things and
me
> dealing with the MI undercover guys was very im****tant at the time.
Typo? Forgery?
What I cited was the actual google archive you idiot. It clearly shows
that
once again you were enhancing your military career to fit the conversation
-
http://tinyurl.com/vyrt8.
It is clear and unambigous - you said "I spent 30 years in the Military.
First the US Marine Corps, then the United States Army. My last command
was
a MI command".
> 12. Mr. Brooks, I will tell you what a lawyer told me recently about
your
> posts. He said that "reading your posts about me has become somewhat of
a
> game with him, as he knows somewhere in that post there will be a lie, a
> fraud or a distortion of some kind - and it is getting to be fun to find
> them." (Or words to that effect). Mr Brooks when your posts are removed
> from the dregs, psychos and parrots that you insulate yourself with on
the
> newsgroup, and away from those that you have conned into believing you
due
> to all those fake Federal Agent claims, REAL experts, lawyers, and even
> Web Managers shake their heads in utter disbelief at your outrageous
> fraud, lies, forgeries, distortions and categorical misrepresentations,
> not to mention your production of slanted and clearly biased " evidence"
> to try and prove your defamation.
>
> 12-a. Some examples are: (1). You always try to use hearsay as evidence
> against first hand witness accounts to defame the first hand witness.
You
> have not only done this to me, but to several other people that tried to
> post their experiences on this newsgroup. You have a pattern of using
> fraud and hearsay to defame people, and your gang chimes in on your
fraud
> so they can "howl down" the truth with absolute hearsay bull****. That
act
> alone has experts in investigation and the law shaking their heads in
> utter disbelief.
Actually Mr. Reiman what I have used are your words. The actual words
which
you wrote to the various USENET newsgroups over the past 10 or so years
concerning your claims regarding your service in the United States
Military
and your experiences in Vietnam. Your words were compared with your
records
and the actual historical records available.
I have concluded that you lied and grossly misrepresented your actual
experiences.
I came to that conclusion not after reviewing only one of your posts
because
I realize that memory is apt to be faulty, that typos do occur, and that
some folks do indeed joke. I reached the conclusion after submitting all
of
your writings to intense scrutiny and comparing them with the facts.
There
was a common thread throughout all of the posts - it was the strong smell
of
bovine feces.
A case in point:
Your claims of having known General Wesley Clark:
http://tinyurl.com/e6pqn
"I knew General Clark, I met him once in Vietnam and again in
Aberdeen Proving Ground (I believe it was he at Aberdeen but I am
not positive) and I am sure he will never remember me, and for
that I am thankful."
and when challenged about the claim - you were adamant (as usually you
are)
http://tinyurl.com/k9cky
"Doug Says: John, duh, when you are introduced to a man you then
"know him." I didn't need to go to the club and have drinks with
the man to know him. I was introduced to General Clark, and I
answered several of his questions - and therefore, I knew the
man. "
"Doug Says: I never lie, and I never flip flop, you know that
John and that is why you can post any proof of your preposterous
and false claims about me or anyone else. "
"President Bush did not slander or libel John McCain, and I did
know General Clark."
The fact is of course that none of the above ever happened.
I analyzed your claim and used tried and true investigative techniques to
determine it's veracity. My investigation determined that your claim to
have met General Wesley Clark in Vietnam was a lie
My investigation determined that during the time you were in Vietnam (Feb
1968 - Apr 1969), Wesley Clark was a Company Grade Officer in the United
States attending Ranger School at Fort Benning and then subsequently a
command at a post in the United States. He did not arrive in Vietnam
until
one month after you had already left.
I then evaluated your claim that you had been introduced to General Clark
when he inspected your section at Aberdeen Proving Ground.
Again I used tried and true investigative techniques in evaluating the
plausibility of your claim - I found that there was no evidence to sup****t
your claim in fact all the evidence pointed to the likelyhood that the
event
never happened.
During the period that you were assigned to Aberdeen Proving Ground,
Wesley
Clark was a West Point Cadet at USMA West Point. Immediately following
his
commission into the US Army in 1966, he went to Oxford on a Rhodes
Fellow****p.
I used exactly the same investigative analysis in evaluating your other
usenet postings - which taken as a whole are indicative of a Master
Bull****
Artiste.
Tell that to your attorneys and experts
Nigel Brooks
|
