MACK DADDY wrote:
> On May 10, 2:28 pm, Bas Mati <w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> MACK DADDY wrote:
>>> On May 10, 12:54 pm, Bas Mati <w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> MACK DADDY wrote:
>>>>> On May 10, 10:43 am, Bas Mati <w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> MACK DADDY wrote:
>>>>>>> On May 9, 2:42 pm, Crescentius Vespasianus <jazzyb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In his quest to get the middle class out of their cars, Obama has
a
>>>>>>>> plan to add an additional 50 cent tax to a gallon of gas to
already
>>>>>>>> skyrocketing gas prices. Instead of cutting wasteful programs,
Barack
>>>>>>>> Obama wants to tax the already hurting middle class for funds to
>>>>>>>> rebuild America's crumbling infrastructure. If it works like
what the
>>>>>>>> government has done with the increases in the Cigarette tax,
expect a
>>>>>>>> continuation of bridges falling into rivers. 90% of the
additional
>>>>>>>> cigarette taxes have been used to fund gold-plated pension and
medical
>>>>>>>> plans for government employees, and almost none of it was used
for
>>>>>>>> education and medical services. Expect the same in those gas
taxes
>>>>>>>> Obama is going to make you pay ($15 per fill-up).
>>>>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>>>> Sounds good to me! I currently pay about $35 to fill up, so I
will be
>>>>>>> quite happy with the Obama discount eh!
>>>>>> Are you that ****ING STUPID????
>>>>>> Read the post, that's $15 on TOP of the market price, you socialist
nitwit!- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>> NO, THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU ****IN' SAID,
>>>> Correct, CHECK THE ATTRIBUTIONS YOU MICRO_WHORE!
>>>>> YOU FUGGIN REPUBLITARD.
>>>> YOU S***BAG DUMBOCRAP!
>>>>> You
>>>>> said $15 bucks to fill up, and I said that's awesome!
>>>> You must be stump ****ing stupid - read the damned quote:
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> "Expect the same in those gas taxes
>>>> Obama is going to make you pay ($15 per fill-up)."
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> How anyone, even a ****wit like YOU, could take that to mean a tank
of
>>>> gas will cost only $15 is just stunningly stupid!
> but you said it!
>
>>>>> Can you defend
>>>>> Bush raising the gas price from $1.50 per gallon to nearly $4.00? I
>>>>> doubt it!
>>>> You're right, he hasn't and I won't!
> He did, and you probably do!
You've become incessantly immature, **** off.
>>>> Sorry the free market and demand from China and India made things
pricey
>
> Sorry. The unjustified war on Iraq caused it.
Incorrect, estimates of the "terror" premium put it no higher than the
$10-15/brl range, stop lying.
>
>>>> - so it goes when folks want a better lifestyle and consume more.-
Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> Wow! You even requoted it! Obama is gonna make us pay 15 dollars to
>>> fill up.
>> See you really ARE that stupid, amazing!
>
> You stupid Republitard
Liberal automaton.
>>> That's much better than the 35 dollars I currently pay!
>> You're paying $35 in gas taxes?
> NO! NOT TAXES. I said it costs me about 35 dollars to fill my tank.
You only have a 10 gallon tank?
> I like that you said Obama will only charge me 15 dollars.
I didn't, your reading comprehension is atrocious.
>> WHERE????
> In Wa****ngton state!
And you're paying $35 in taxes per fill up?
I don't think so:
http://www.wa****ngtongasprices.com/tax_info.aspx
Rates include Federal excise taxes 18.4 cpg for gasoline and 24.4 cpg
for diesel. cpg = cents per gallon
State Gasoline ¢/g) Diesel¢/g)
Wa****ngton 54.4 60.4
You saying you have a car with a 70 gallon gas tank?
>>> You still failed to acknowledge that Bush and Cheney raised the gas
>>> price from 1.50 per gallon up to about 3.80 per gallon.
>> Indeed, because they DIDN'T!
> Yes they did! Check out the facts!
The facts are not something you have any interest in.
>> OPEC, scarcity and demand from India and China handled that.
> War handled it!
Nope, dead wrong.
Read the demand data.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/07/business/07oil.html?em&ex=1210305600&en=40c8ce5fb1d95c98&ei=5087%0A
In its monthly re****t, the Energy Department projected that domestic
petroleum consumption would decline by about 190,000 barrels a day this
year, a result of the economic slowdown and high prices. That is a
sharper drop than the 90,000-barrel-a-day decline projected by the
department last month.
After accounting for increased ethanol use, domestic consumption will
fall by 330,000 barrels a day, or less than 1 percent of total gasoline
demand. While limited, it would be the first annual decline in gasoline
demand since 1991.
The Energy Department expects oil prices to average $110 a barrel this
year, about $9 more than its previous outlook.
Despite these higher costs, global oil demand is still projected to rise
by 1.2 million barrels a day this year, mostly because of growing
consumption in China, the Middle East, Russia, Brazil and India.
China alone will account for a third of the jump in consumption. In
March, Chinese im****ts rose by 800,000 barrels a day, compared with
levels a year earlier, a big increase that could mean China is filling
its oil reserve needs before the start of the Olympic Games this summer.
Oil supplies, meanwhile, continue to lag behind. After a drop in
Nigerian output last month, production by OPEC nations fell 1 percent in
April, according to a survey by Bloomberg News.
Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Ex****ting Countries pumped
an average of 32.1 million barrels a day last month, down 320,000
barrels from March, according to the survey of oil companies, producers
and analysts.
Nigerian production dropped by 160,000 barrels, to an average of 1.88
million barrels a day, the country’s lowest level since August 1999. The
country’s output suffered from a strike by Exxon Mobil workers. Adding
to these troubles, rebel militants have apparently resumed their attacks
on oil companies in the Niger Delta, forcing Royal Dutch Shell to reduce
production.
As demand continues to outpace the growth in oil supplies, analysts
expect little relief in prices. A shortfall in supplies over the next
two years will probably send oil to $150 to $200 a barrel, Goldman Sachs
said in a new re****t.
>> You really are just breathtakingly STUPID!- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> You better stop! You get stupider with every post, just like
> Republitards do!
Dude, you have severely flamed out this time. Go away and lick your
wounds.
|
