On May 9, 12:39 pm, "Harry Dope" <Pres.McCain...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Considering his being black is why he attended an anti-white racist
church
> that promoted Black Liberation Theology for 20 years then I say no its
not.
> Black Liberation Theology does not promote racial harmony and a united
> America.
Jesus, just how stupid are you?
Wait, you're stupid enough, I'd better advise that the above question
was rhetorical. meaning you don't have to answer.
1. The church Obama attended belongs to a denomination that is 90%
white.
2. Black Liberation Theology isn't anti-white; it's about black
empowerment. You people are always whining that black people should
pick themselves up by their own bootstraps, but then when they promote
the idea that blacks should make their own way in the world, you whine
that they're "anti-white."
3. That church actually has a significant number of white members.
4. Obama attended that church for 20 years. I attended Catholic
churches for about 16 years, and had at least one pastor who was a
dickweed, and I knew a lot of people in that church who thought so.
They didn't quit that church, because they were going for the others
in the church, not to please their pastor.
I'll give you one thing; you're honest. You're ignorant, a racist and
a bigot, and you don't even try to hide it. I guess that's
something...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Tragic if it proves to be true.
> ========
> > Why is it "tragic?" Obama is an elitist racist with no idea what the
****
> > he is doing.
>
> For the reason...
>
> Because he's Black.
>
> If this is the reason... and it turns out to be true... that would be
> tragic.
>
> -C-
|
