On Sun, 11 May 2008 06:17:45 -0700 (PDT), milt.shook@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>On May 9, 12:39 pm, "Harry Dope" <Pres.McCain...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Considering his being black is why he attended an anti-white racist
church
>> that promoted Black Liberation Theology for 20 years then I say no its
not.
>> Black Liberation Theology does not promote racial harmony and a united
>> America.
>
>Jesus, just how stupid are you?
>
>Wait, you're stupid enough, I'd better advise that the above question
>was rhetorical. meaning you don't have to answer.
>
>1. The church Obama attended belongs to a denomination that is 90%
>white.
<LOL> Total bull****....
>2. Black Liberation Theology isn't anti-white; it's about black
>empowerment. You people are always whining that black people should
>pick themselves up by their own bootstraps, but then when they promote
>the idea that blacks should make their own way in the world, you whine
>that they're "anti-white."
>3. That church actually has a significant number of white members.
>4. Obama attended that church for 20 years. I attended Catholic
>churches for about 16 years, and had at least one pastor who was a
>dickweed, and I knew a lot of people in that church who thought so.
>They didn't quit that church, because they were going for the others
>in the church, not to please their pastor.
>
>I'll give you one thing; you're honest. You're ignorant, a racist and
>a bigot, and you don't even try to hide it. I guess that's
>something...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Tragic if it proves to be true.
>> ========
>> > Why is it "tragic?" Obama is an elitist racist with no idea what the
****
>> > he is doing.
>>
>> For the reason...
>>
>> Because he's Black.
>>
>> If this is the reason... and it turns out to be true... that would be
>> tragic.
>>
>> -C-
|
