WAR STORIES THREE - ARTICLE 07
SP4 OLSON AND THE WALL
(This IS a copyrighted article).
© Copyright all materials written by Author DGV Reiman 2008, all rights
reserved. By posting or publi****ng this article and other copyrighted
articles on USENET and/or elsewhere, Author is expressly NOT granting
any implied authorization to reproduce his copyrighted work in any
manner. The Author further does not accept as "Fair Use" under U.S. Code
Title 17, nor will condone, the reproduction of any ****tion of his
copyrighted materials IN ANY MANNER for the purpose of harassing,
stalking or defaming the Author, or in conjunction with any violation of
any civil or criminal statutes. Violators will face legal action. If
anyone wishes to reproduce my copyrighted materials all they need to do
first is email me and receive back via email my written permission to do
so - such permission will not be unreasonably withheld. As I have often
stated, I post copyrighted articles on USENET for a pre-review by the
public prior to placing those articles in a book to be sold in
international commerce. All those that read these articles already know
or should already know my copyrighted articles cannot be infringed upon
in any manner simply because they were first posted on USENET. Moreover,
according to case law and expert answers in respect to this issue, the
general stated policy of newgroups, such as to invite comment, DOES NOT
preclude, supercede nor abrogate the author's right of copyright
protection. Moreover, case law has further provided a precedent that
"Fair Use" cannot be claimed by an infringer to disguise the spiteful
and defaming reproduction of an author's work.
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all of
my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contem****ary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please notify me of
your specific reasons for annoyance via email at legalcoach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain, and
to present articles to USENET readers prior to publication to determine
interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way cause anyone
emotional harm by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please note that
defending myself from harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has
been deemed a "lawful and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel.
If I am not attacked, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles
not interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP's and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site
or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
op****tunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
THIS POST IS A REBUTTAL TO NIGEL BROOKS FRAUD AND FALSE ACCUSATIONS IN
RESPECT TO THIS ISSUE
Please note that as Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks several defaming posts about
this issue clearly state, he is inviting my rebuttal to his often
repeated false statements and accusations about Sp4 Olson and me in
respect to; (1) impersonating or inciting one of his gang members to
impersonate Sp4 Olson, a Purple Heart Medal winner (Medal not Card), and
(2) claiming the patrol that I was helping to lead did not occur (3) and
his outright fraudulent claims that neither Sp4 Olson nor Sp4 Nelson,
both were members of my squad which were walking just a few feet from me
on this patrol, were NOT wounded, and both did NOT receive the Purple
Heart Medal for their wounds (Medals not Cards).
Although I have answered Sp4 Nigel Brook's false and defamation
accusations in respect to this issue many times before, below is
irrefutable proof Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks is lying about this issue, based
upon what I have learned to this date, which is considerably more than I
knew a year ago:
The following Google archived post provides the information I previously
posted in respect to a SP4 Olson, who was a member of my squad and was
wounded while on a combat patrol and was walking only a few feet behind
me. I helped lead this particular SRF (Special Reactionary Force) combat
patrol (one of many) and this particular combat patrol occurred during
the May 1968 Viet Cong major offensive, (little Tet) while I was serving
with the 25th Infantry Division, Cu Chi, Vietnam. (I know the Dai Uy
a.k.a Tom Rau former Junior Reserve Officer has posted that I was never
in Vietnam, and was never assigned to the 25th Infantry Division, and
was never in Combat, but we all know my military records prove Mr. Rau
an outrageous liar and fraud merchant in this respect).
Sp4 Olson was wounded that night along with another member of my squad,
Sp4 Nelson, who was also severely wounded enough to warrant a Purple
Heart Medal (Medal not Card).
In fact, I believe most of the men located in or around those two men
received major or minor wounds, or at least concussions, or both. I know
I certainly did, and the first or second enemy round explosions knocked
me down backwards and my ears rang for weeks after that event. (That was
my second head blow in about a month from an enemy round explosion). I
also received some small minor cuts from either shrapnel or gravel, and
I found blood in my boot when I returned to my hootch from a hit on the
back of my leg. I had received a small cut on the back of my leg that I
treated with my GI iodine and a gauze band aid. (Please note I am NOT
claiming that I received nor deserved a Purple Heart Medal for that tiny
wound nor concussion. I did not seek official medical treatment for
either, and consequently, I have been told that since I did not seek
medical treatment I am not eligible for a Purple Heart Medal. Moreover,
I find it utterly preposterous that anyone (including the pathetic brown
nosing Nigel Brooks gang members) would claim that I or anyone else
should receive a Purple Heart Medal for such minor wounds as they have
done repeatedly. I do realize others (such as John Kerry) have certainly
received a Purple Heart Medal for similar minor wounds and injuries.
However, I find those that pander for medals for such minor wounds
and/or for doing one's simple duty not only disgusting but cowardly).
My squad was not the only squad that received casualties that night, and
there were several other casualties in other squads located in the same
patrol. The VC were waiting for us. They ambushed us with several
different weapons including Mortars, and if memory serves small arms
fire and Grenades (some other members of that patrol I have spoken with
in the past also believed RPG's were involved in that Ambush, but that I
cannot confirm - I was too busy and the patrol column was fairly long).
If memory serves, some of the men left standing (at my point on the
column) fired back at the enemy. After the second major barrage of fire
from the VC was over, the small arms fire continued from both sides but
was s****adic. Many men were firing at shadows or flashes.
At one time or another many men on that patrol helped and treated
wounded men regardless of the incoming fire. No one received nor
pandered for a medal for helping wounded men under fire during that
ambush. Moreover, during my time at the 25th Infantry Division stopping
to help and treat wounded or injured men under fire was a given in an
Infantry Division. Medals for not leaving a man behind nor for treating
his wounds/injuries under fire were not asked for nor given, unless it
also involved other extreme extraordinary cir***stances.
Over the years I have been able to converse with people that were on
that patrol. Their memories of what happened that night are about the
same as mine (foggy) albeit not exactly the same as different vantage
points, perspectives, and times, creates different memories in humans,
especially during a time of trauma. As a case in point I do not remember
helping to load wounded men onto the trucks that came up to take us and
our wounded out of the battle, (although I was told I did) and I do not
remember when one of those trucks almost turned over after it was loaded
due to driver error or a Mortar round explosion or the combination of
the two. I also am not claiming I did anything special nor heroic, I did
nothing in my opinion much different from what everyone else was doing
during that ambush - trying to stay alive.
(I noticed on a recent Sunday night (04/20/08) CBS's 60 minutes did a
complete segment on an American unit fighting in Afghanistan that
suffered a total of three casualties due to a Taliban ambush. I suspect
if this May 1968 ambush occurred today it would comparably warrant a
complete movie. It is amazing how times change. But then the Division
would need to tell the truth about this major cluster ****, and we all
know that would never happen. In Vietnam, news agencies printed what
they were told by information officers that were under orders to lie
about such U.S. Army gaffs and officer errors).
After that particular patrol, I attempted to visit Sp4 Olson the next
day in the 25th 's hospital, but I was denied access to him due to the
severity of his wounds. I could see him lying in his bed, but I was not
allowed to try and speak with him. I was told his wounds were extremely
serious, he was hit with shrapnel in the liver, and he was to be
med-evacuated out that day. A few months later and after I had extended
for a second tour of duty in Vietnam and had been ultimately transferred
to Can Tho, (I was assigned to another unit before Can Tho for a couple
of months - which Sp4 Nigel Brooks always forgets to mention when he
lies about my military records) I had a chance encounter with Sp4 Nelson
at a beer hall on the Beach at Vung Tau. Sp4 Nelson told me at that time
he had "heard" Sp4 Olson had died of his wounds. That was terrible news
at the time, and I rejoice in the fact that I later found out Sp4 Nelson's
rumor about Sp4 Olson was not true.
After Sp4 Nelson's revelation at Vung Tau about Sp4 Olson, and because I
could not remember Sp4 Olson's first name, and when I noted that several
"Olson's" were listed on the Vietnam Memorial Wall, I naturally surmised
that one of those "Olson" names belonged to one of the men I had lost
that night in my squad. (In fact I was not even sure if his last name
was "Olson" or "Olsen" and he was assigned to my squad for only a couple
of months before he was wounded and med-evacuated out).
I also remember that Sp4 Nelson was assigned to my hootch along with
other members of my squad, and unlike Sp4 Olson, I do remember Sp4
Nelson fairly well. In fact it was Sp4 Nelson and a couple of other men
in my squad that I ordered to replace our hootch's door due to it
receiving extreme shrapnel damage due to repeated hits from Enemy 122
Rockets and Mortar rounds. One night of those several attacks was the
first time I received a minor concussion and some minor wood splinter
cuts from an enemy round that just about destroyed our hootch door (on
or about April 1968) according to my memory and medical records.
Several men in that same hootch received minor wounds and one a serious
wound from those 122 Rocket attacks. At that time, and in many cases,
and due to the enemies' regular and often repeated Mortar and Rocket
fire, going out on patrol or pulling SRF duty was much safer than
staying in our hootch, (Charlie just loved to make our stand downs a
real *****). (I should also mention that door replacement might be a
matter of company record as at first the First Sergeant said I might be
required to pay for the door because I ordered it replaced without first
gaining permission from the Company Commander. Yet when a L.T. from the
Company Inspected the Hootch and noted all of the shrapnel holes, and
inspected what was left of the door, he authorized a new door and I paid
for nothing. I was told later that particular hootch was used as an
aiming point for Charlie as it was bordering the Airfield - I don't know
if that is true but I do know it was a ***** living in that "rocket
alley" hootch).
Sp4 Olson Investigation
After my assumption Sp4 Olson had died of his wounds was challenged by
Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks (even a blind Pig finds a Truffle now and then) I
did some more investigating, and I determined that my SP4 Olson DID NOT
die of his wounds, and his name does NOT appear on the Vietnam Memorial
Wall. This investigation took some time, especially when I did not
remember Sp4 Olson's first name and I was not sure of the spelling of
his last name.
I have since located Mr. Olson, and I am not allowed to reveal any of
his personal information at this time as he does not want to be further
impersonated and smeared by a gang of smear merchants. However, the
following is what I can reveal which should put this issue to rest, and
of course irrefutably prove Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau have been
repeatedly lying about this issue and many other similar issues - but
that fact should already be well-known by now anyway: (I am authorized
to send more information to a third party expert for verification, so if
anyone wants that to happen, let me know).
Very soon after Sp4 Olson (correct spelling is "Olson") was wounded he
was med-evacuated out of the 25th Infantry Division to the MHDUSAH 106th
General Hospital located in Japan, and then finally to MHC (3411) MGH
Tacoma Wa****ngton. He stayed in the Hospital for a few months, then he
was reassigned to a holding company in Ft. Lewis, Wa, and then
reassigned to a permanent company; Co A USAG Ft. Lewis, Wash. After that
assignment he was then reassigned to USAREUR Germany, for duty with
ODCSOPS, then he was discharged from the US Army. He was awarded the
Purple Heart Medal for his wounds he received during the above-mentioned
patrol. (All of the above can be verified with information I am sending
to a third party for expert review).
Sp4 Nelson remained with the 25th Infantry Division, was never
med-evacuated for his wounds, received the Purple Heart Medal on the
same day and for the same action as SP4 Olson and I were on, and he was
returned to California for a brief assignment then discharged as a SP5.
Obviously, and as I have already told Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks several
times, Sp4 Olson did not die of his wounds, and his name is not on the
wall. My mistake in that respect is understandable considering the
cir***stances. But if my mistake about Sp4 Olson has offended anyone
(which I seriously doubt since it did not offend Mr. Olson) I sincerely
apologize for making that mistake, and I rejoice in the fact that Sp4
Olson survived that night.
(For those that have actually led men in combat no news can be better
received than to find out years later that one of your men completely
recovered from what appeared, at the time, to be mortal wounds).
The following is excerpted from my 2004 copyrighted account re-posted in
2007:
" Sp4 Olson received a mortal wound in his liver that night, (as I was
informed after he was med-evacuated but turned out to not be true) and
Sp4 Nelson was wounded in the arm. (Nelson, if you are reading this by
chance email me)."
Obviously, Mr. Nigel Brooks knew all along that I had said I had found
out that Sp4 Olson did not die of his wounds long before Mr. Brooks
started harping on me saying that Sp4 Olson's name was on the Wall. So
why does Mr. Brooks keep asking the same question over and over again?
Harassment? Cyberstalking? False accusations? Defamation? To cast me and
my service, and SP4 Olson's service in a false and demeaning light? Or
all of the above?
There can be no other rational answer for his repeated and defaming
questioning of an issue that has been already asked and answered several
times. Yes I make mistakes, we all do, but to harp on that mistake for
years after I have admitted I made it is beyond rational comprehension,
other than recognizing some perverse and obsessive reason to defame or
smear.
I will not repeat the thousands (yes thousands) of fraudulent and false
accusations Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks and his pathetic brown nosing smear
gang chums posted about this issue, as I would be busy displaying
volumes of redundant defamation from Brooks and company, which would be
better left to a review by the experts and the lawyers and the judges.
However, below are just a few examples of fraudulent accusations
published by Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks that denied the patrol ever took place
(without any evidence whatsoever to back up his false accusations of
course): ( I believe a typical Nigel Brooks "investigation" = Crystal
Ball, and Soothsaying by reading the entrails of little animals, then he
attempts to forge evidence to fit his prognostications he divined off of
his Crystal Ball and Soothsaying Black M***** - I could be wrong of
course, it just might be true that Nigel Brooks is a dyed-in-the-wool
smear and fraud merchant and he posts his false accusations for the
deliberate purpose to smear and defame former Sergeants, or other
Veterans for some perverse and sick reason).
Sp4 Nigel Brooks' (the only self-acclaimed EXPERT on the U.S. Army in
history that was only a Sp4 Draftee that spent two whole years in the US
Army) said:
"Oh I'm not lying Mr. Reiman - I am positive that your stories exist
only in your
imagination." Nigel Brooks, April 24, 2006.
April 24, 2006, 7:36 PM. "Point 2. I think that you fail to see the
point that if indeed the enemy had infiltrated Cu Chi base camp in June
1968, set up a mortar position inside the base at a latrine resulting in
dozens of casualties - It would have been re****ted in the 25th Division
Newsletter
http://www.25thida.com/TLN/
Well Mr. Reiman - it wasn't re****ted.
Conclusion - it never happened.
Nigel Brooks
Doug's Rebuttal: First I have no idea as to the total amount of
casualties that occurred that night, it might have been "dozens," if you
include all wounds and concussions, it might have been less, so I first
want to point out that Mr. Brooks use of the term "dozens of casualties"
may or may not be true and there is no way I could possibly know the
correct amount. Moreover, if you go to the web site provided above by
Mr. Brooks you will find that the entire month of May 1968 is not
available on the 25th Unit newspaper - and even if it was I doubt if the
true story would have ever been published. Yet Sp4 Nigel Brooks attempts
to misrepresent and deceive all with his false claim that the event was
"not re****ted." Yet in truth and In fact it *had* to be re****ted or the
men involved that received their Purple Heart Medals would have not
received them!
Moreover, Mr. Sp4 Brooks use of "Unit newspaper" accounts is more akin
to quoting Joseph Goebbels than quoting fact. We all know the
information officers for the 25th Infantry division have testified
before Congress they were ordered to lie in those re****ts and articles.
So not only is Mr. Sp4 Brooks claim "it was never re****ted" is a
complete and total lie, his reference to Unit newspapers for his
confirmation of events is beyond laughable, it is downright idiotic
considering what we all know about those Unit newspapers.
If you read the testimony before Congress from the Information
Commissioned Officer of the 25th Infantry Division, along with the two
Brigade level Information Specialists that provided information to the
25th Infantry Division newsletter and unit newspapers, the Stars and
Stripes, and provided information that was used in many After Action
Re****ts, you will find these officers and men testified (1) they were
ordered to lie and hide information in those re****ts, and (2) truthful
articles that reflected detrimentally on officers or the Division, or
articles that reflected heavy American casualties were never allowed to
be published.
A 25th Infantry Division Officer Was Responsible for the Patrol's Ambush
Considering a 25th Infantry Division Major gave us the battle plan for
this patrol in an open mess hall, with dozens of Vietnamese civilian KP's
standing around (half of which were spies for Charlie) and then the
patrol was subsequently ambushed that night on the very route the Major
provided on his map, no wonder there seems to be a mysterious absence of
the true accounts of what happened that night by the 25th Infantry
Division Information officer. And there also seems to be a mysterious
absence or accounting of me finding VC tunnels right under our base camp
after I chased a VC down an old trench one night (not more than three
hundred yards or so from my hootch) and me watching him duck into one of
those tunnel entrances (and yes I have witnesses to that event as well -
and I also was ordered to shut up about that issue as it would harm
Division morale).
Impersonating Sp4 Olson and Stealing our Honor
Mr. Sp4 draftee Nigel Brooks is stealing and besmirching the honor and
valor of all those men that participated in that said patrol without a
shred of evidence his fraudulent accusations about me and that patrol
are true. What Sp4 draftee Nigel Brooks often deceptively uses to
bolster his false accusations is what is known in legal jargon as "an
illogical fallacy." Which means that if "I say X is Y and there is no
evidence that X is not Y, then what I say is true." That "negative
proof" deceptive nonsense is not even allowed in our courts, and is a
known con man and smear merchant tactic, yet it seems to me to be the
hallmark of Nigel Brooks' "investigations."
The only investigator that would use negative proof claims to sup****t
his conclusions would be "Inspector Cluso" or a completely dishonest
investigator, which I will prove with testimony of REAL independent
investigators.
Not only is Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks deliberately stealing the honor of the
men that participated in that ill-fated combat patrol, he is also
stealing, besmirching and contradicting the valor and award of several
Purple Heart Medals that are on the official record as being awarded for
participation in that very patrol which I was on and helped to lead.
(And no, I am not saying, hinting nor implying that I received a Purple
Heart Medal on that patrol! And I am also not claiming I did anything
heroic nor different from any other squad leader on that patrol! I
thought I would mention this disclaimer before I am again falsely
accused of saying that along with me receiving nineteen Purple Heart
Medals, being Rambo, and receiving the Medal of Honor, and the Victoria
Cross, and the order of the CIA Cross Border Assassin badge, and that I
was really fighting for the Martians that arrived that night in their
space ****ps, and other outright fraudulent accusations and preposterous
nonsense which is analogous to the typical false accusations and utter
bull**** fraud I usually receive from Sp4 Nigel Brooks or his pathetic
brown nosing crackpot smear gang.)
If Mr. Sp4 Brooks theft of the honor and valor of those men on that
patrol with me is not enough to depict Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks as the true
fraud merchant he is, there is yet even another Nigel Brooks brown
nosing gang issue that deals with Sp4 Olson that has dismayed us all
that were on that particular combat patrol; and that is when a member of
the Nigel Brooks brown nose smear gang impersonated Sp4 Olson (a Purple
Heart Medal winner) (not Card, Medal) for the deliberate purpose to
defame me, and conspired with other gang members to steal his and my
honor by fraudulently misrepresenting our service in Vietnam. I don't
know if impersonating a Purple Heart Medal winner is a violation of the
Stolen Valor Act, or deliberately and fraudulently lying about a Vietnam
Vet's service is also a violation of that same act, but if not it
certainly should be.
Stolen Valor and Stolen Honor by the Nigel Brooks Gang
http://tinyurl.com/4s2glp
Sp4 Olson forgery and Dai Uy's (Tom Rau's)
response to his gang members forgery with outrageous defamation and
fraud.
"Responding to an obvious forgery from Sp4 Olson most likely posted by
the SteveL serial liar, fraud merchant, cyberstlalker and smear merchant
and gang member, Mr. Rau, (a.k.a. Dai Uy) responded with:
"Point number two, and this is the clincher: SFC Reiman -- the artful
dodger -- never set foot in Viet Nam -- not in Cu Chi, and not in Can
Tho."
Mr. Tom Rau also went on to claim that Sp4 Olson also never went to
Vietnam with the following:
"You sure your little rendezvous wasn't in Wa****ngton state rather than
Viet Nam? He has been there. "
Dai Uy
Mr. Tom Rau (a.k.a. Dai Uy) also distorted what I said about the enemy
firing mortars point blank; he said "hit by point-blank mortar fire."
Which is an idiotic distortion as the context was clearly the enemy
could not miss, and getting wounded by a Mortar round that was fired
close or far away would not be any different - but then perhaps Mr. Rau
has never seen enough enemy Mortar fire to know the difference?
Unfortunately I have.
Purple Heart Medal Forgery
Another rampaging smear and defamation by Nigel Brooks and his gang
members have also recently been exposed and reviewed in my favor by a
military law expert:
September 23, 2005 I wrote and Dai Uy responded to:
http://tinyurl.com/45puam
"Understand Rau, if my CO in Vietnam or Korea did not believe I deserved
the PH then as far as I am concerned that is the end of the matter. I
asked the Board of Corrections if he (Vietnam CO) submitted a request
for that medal after I left Vietnam, and they said he did
not. So either he forgot, did not care since I was already gone (I left
suddenly on emergency leave although I was close to my DEROS and already
had my assignment) or he did not believe I
deserved it."
I also wrote:
"Doug Says: If I post a quip about Vietnam, OUTSIDE of this NG, which I
have done in the past, it is to make a point, embellish a point, in
respect to the context of the information I am providing or debating.
Other than that, I have asked (which a Google search proves) all to
email me if they want to know the details of my quips, or have them
explained. Neither you nor
Brooks did that - as it was clear from the start you two intended to
smear me with false interpretations of what you claimed I said in the
past."
So all the way back to September 2005, months before Nigel or Rau or the
SteveL serial liar and cyberstalker started to howl and bark that my
typist's "missing" exchange 17 with Chip was about medals and not about
what we all said it was about, VA Purple Heart ID cards, (the gang's
fraud and false accusations in respect to this PH Card issue started in
June 2006) I had already long before told Dai Uy, (and he acknowledged
my post by replying to it) that I DID NOT have a PH Medal and I was not
claiming that I did and that I never claimed I did.
(I should also mention that I said I did not have a Purple Heart Medal
long before as far back as 1998, and that statement is on the official
court record - and that no purple heart medal statement occurred long
before the discarded Chip response post date of 2003).
I also made it very clear that I only discuss my military service via
private email once I know precisely who I am conversing with. Mr. Rau
(Dai Uy) acknowledged these facts I posted with his response. Yet
unbelievably and obviously disingenuously, months later, (starting in
June 2006) he and Nigel started to bark and howl that I had claimed the
very opposite he acknowledged I was stating months before! (I should
also point out that in 2003 I also said I would never post my
autobiographical information on USENET, and further stated in 2003 right
after this erred post was posted by my typist that any claim the PH Card
post was about medals was "a complete distortion.")
Quick Summary
In September 2005 Dai Uy agrees and acknowledges that I said I did not
have a Purple Heart Medal, then months later he reverses what I said and
what he agreed to by helping Brooks' forge the term "Medals" into a long
discarded post that was about Purple Heart VA ID cards. Mr. Tom Rau also
fraudulently stated in the above post above, again, that I was
personally claiming 1803 kills in Vietnam.
Since the cyberstalker SteveL and his fellow gang members Nigel Brooks
and Tom Rau decided to slime so low as to maliciously interfere with my
posts, contracts, internet resources and computer processes, to
resurrect long discarded waste-basket posts that were discarded due to
stated errors or typos, for the purpose of defaming me over long
discarded and obvious typos, I sent this issue to an independent
military expert (I have never met the man before in my life) that is
also an expert on the law, replete with several advanced degrees.
He has reviewed in length the entire Chip post record, the statements
from my typist, the email evidence involving Chip, my other posts
referencing Purple Heart ID Cards, and the statement that was provided
Google when the erred post was removed from the Google archives due to
its obvious ambiguity. After a thorough investigation he concluded that
our topic of conversation and true context contained in my typist's
reply to Chip was referencing Purple Heart Cards that were issued by the
VA and NOT Purple Heart Medals.
He also was astonished that someone would maliciously resurrect a
discarded post from a waste basket long removed from Google and tossed
into my waste basket due to an admitted error, for the malicious and
deliberate purpose of defamation and harassment, and then add to his
fraud and maliciousness by forging the context of that discarded post by
adding the term "Medal" to it - although this same fraud merchant had
been told the exact opposite of his forgery several times!
My expert also confirmed that posts do not mysteriously reappear on the
Google archive if they have been removed by a person authorized to
remove them. I have his fairly lengthy re****t in writing, and if anyone
is interested in reviewing it please email me at legalcoach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and my lawyer will provide your lawyer or you with a copy. No fake names
please. We want to know whom we are dealing with due to charges that are
being prepared against the SteveL cyberstalker. (BTW, if anyone knows
where the SteveL anonymous cyberstalker can be served with legal papers
or a warrant, please let me know).
Regarding the 1803 Estimated Body Count I said WE achieved (I said the
"WE" term included all of my units in Vietnam) was clearly (1) only an
estimate, and (2) had nothing to do with any BC I was personally
claiming. When I was asked how many enemy I killed personally I replied
with "As many as I could." (Obviously I did not state any number simply
because I do not have a clue how many enemies I killed or helped to
kill).
The now infamous 1803 personal kills forgery and fraud posted by Tom
Rau, and his and his smear gang's Purple Heart Medal forgery, and his
outrageous and completely fraudulent statements above about me never
serving in Vietnam, never serving in the 25th Infantry division and
never serving in Can Tho, never achieving the rank of SFC E-7 in
Vietnam, all ties in together, and represents overwhelming evidence of
deliberate fraud, harassment and obloquy, not to mention the theft of
honor of the two men in my squad that received a Purple Heart medal for
participating in my patrol, and of course the similar theft of honor
from the men in other squads on that same ill-fated ambushed patrol that
also were wounded and fought the enemy, and assisted wounded men under
fire.
Please review the following Post for more information in regards to the
smear tactics used by Mr. Tom Rau: http://tinyurl.com/447mjw
All this Tom Rau and Nigel Brooks have repeatedly lied about, said never
happened, and generally defamed and besmirched the honor and valor of
all those men that participated in that patrol for one glaring and
single reason - to defame me.
This smear gang has never before encountered one of their smear victims
defending himself. The gang leaders are used to bullying and smearing
and defaming and lying about anyone they choose, and then using so many
fake names and outright voluminous fraud to overwhelm their target smear
victim and drive him from "their" newsgroup. Yet when one of their smear
victims' does take the time and effort to expose their fraud, forgeries
and false accusations for what they are, and exposes their little
"defamation for profit scam they use on their web sites" the gang's
smear campaign starts to backfire and the world starts to learn the
truth about the lack of integrity, honor and veracity of Nigel Brooks
and his pathetic brown nosing gang of smear merchants.
No doubt the last thing a con man smear merchant ever wants to be
revealed is the truth - and that is precisely what my Rebuttals to their
fraud is doing.
Yet what we find is that Mr. Tom Rau (a.k.a. Dai Uy) not only stole the
honor and valor of Sp4 Olsen by replying to one of his gang member's
obvious impersonation of that Purple Heart Medal recipient, but also
stole the honor of someone that spent at least six months longer in
Vietnam than he did, and probably saw ten times the under-fire combat in
Vietnam than he did, and spent time in Vietnam during some of the worst
times and worst enemy confrontations ever recorded during that war -
long before Mr. Rau even arrived in that country.
I wonder, the next time Mr. Tom Rau (a.k.a. Dai Uy) complains about
someone stealing his valor and honor, will he even mention the times
that he and his smear gang did the same? Will Mr. Rau walk to his
nearest mirror and gaze upon someone that has deliberately besmirched
and stolen the honor of not only Vietnam veterans with much more time in
country and in combat than he, but also besmirched and stole the honor
of all the men that participated in that ambushed patrol with me?
Do you think Messrs. Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau will retract and apologize
to me and Sp4 Olson, Sp4 Nelson, and all the other men that went on that
ill-fated patrol for all of their fraud, harassment and obloquy Rau and
Brooks have published about that patrol? I certainly have retracted my
assumption of me spending nine months more in Vietnam than Tom Rau, and
I have corrected that figure down to six months, and I have also
acknowledged and apologized for my mistake about Sp4 Olson being KIA.
But do you wanna bet $50 dollars Messrs. Brooks and Rau will just run
and hide from their exposed fraud and false accusations? It has been my
experience that smear merchants never correct and never apologize. They
just go onto their next fraud and smear hoping people will forget about
how their past frauds have been glaringly exposed. We shall see. (I also
would like for Mr. Rau to provide some details, including the names of
any men he lost in combat as I have to confirm his self-acclaimed combat
experiences and his self-acclaimed status as a Judge over all other
Vietnam Vets' service. Yet mysteriously, Mr. Rau remains silent in
respect to those issues).
These smear merchants are like a bunch of old crones, hissing wild
Geese, spreading gossip, libel and inciting hate against someone they do
not like or agree with. Pathetic. You would think they could find better
things to do with their sad lives.
I will send all of the private information, along with the details and
evidence relating to Sp4 Olson I posted here to a third-party
independent expert on military issues for his review and corroboration.
I believe Mr. Brooks and Mr. Rau both should retract and apologize over
this issue and hang their heads in shame. But I won't hold my breath
waiting for that to happen, as I know this issue will now be ignored and
they will move onto their next fraud and false accusation. But one by
one, item by item, the truth will be told in respect to ALL of their
fraud and false accusations about me. You can be sure that as long as
they continue to lie, I will continue to rebut those lies with the truth
and will provide irrefutably proof of their lies and fraud.
The next rebuttal will be to Sp4 Nigel Brooks outright lies about what
is contained or is not contained in my military records - with
irrefutable proof he is lying and misrepresenting the contents of my
military records sent to a third party expert.
Doug Grant (Tm)
|
