In article <74c2ccbf-e830-4b3a-b0e0-
d3dd818d33ee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, brilliant@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> An old myth of "Reconquista' (Re-conquest) Sup****ters is that
> 'Mexican' is somehow a race and not a nationality and that 'Mexicans'
> were somehow indigenous to the southwestern United States.
THANK YOU! It's about f**king time someone pointed this out. How
ridiculous is it to see a guy who's half Spanish claiming that the
Apaches are his ancestors and therefore the land of California (and
three or so other states) was stolen from HIM? It is absolutely
ridiculous. There is not a bit of merit in someone whose ancestors
killed as many natives in Mexico, pro****tionately as other European
colonists did in North America claiming to be a "native" to the
Southwestern United States.
It is the very height of lunacy and it's about time it was pointed
out. Don't you feel like barfing when you see one of the idiots from the
"La Rasa" organization talking about how California "...is not
California, USA; it's California, occupied Mexico"?
>
> Both are lies made up by racist brown-supremacist groups and even
> taught to children in some schools south of the border.
>
> Let us Review:
>
> Mexico was founded when the SPANISH colonists declared independence
> from SPAIN.
Yes indeed, and while it's true that many Mexicans are of mixed
race, the ones who are mostly of native blood are the ones who are STILL
oppressed there. Of course, that doesn't stop the dweebs from claiming
that they're natives and are being oppressed by America's immigration
policy.
> There was no Mexico and therefore no Mexicans until the invaders from
> EUROPE declared independence from Spain in 1810.
>
> In fact, the REAL Native Americans are still alive today, thriving on
> and off reservations and most of these American Nations are Federally
> Recognized.
>
> Maps of US Tribes by State - Native Languages of the Americas website
> http://www.native-languages.org/states.htm
>
> The people who were 'here first' in California were the Chumash,
> Tongva and other NATIVE AMERICAN tribes. They built a civilization
> that goes back thousands of years.
>
> The Aztecs NEVER lived in the United States either. The Aztecs ARE
> NOT indigenous to ANY US Territories
Of course not. I don't think there's even common cultural ties
from any of the other cultural groups of South or Central America to
North American natives. Ask an Apache or Hopi if the Mayans were close
relatives; PLEASE!
>
> Rewriting history to say there was anything remotely like a "Mexican"
> before 1810 is a vicious lie is an insult to the brave men and women
> who have fought and died for this country - and are still fighting to
> this day. Sup****t our troops - read a history book!
>
> Short Overview of California Indian History -
> The California Native Heritage Commission
> http://www.ceres.ca.gov/nahc/califindian.html
>
>
>
>
> PRO LEGAL, ANTI ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION SLOGANS
> http://www.SarcasticInk.com
>
Well, let's do be sure to identify the problem correctly however.
The problem is not immigrants from Mexico wanting to come to the US to
have a better life; it's cor****ate interests in the US who want wage
standards driven down and hope to use those people to get that
accomplished.
The best way to fight illegal immigration in this case would be to
make sure the federal law that no worker (legal or otherwise) can be
paid less for doing any job in the US than American would be paid for
doing it. That at once kills the motivation for the people who really
make the decisions for the nation to have their stooges in Wa****ngton DC
draft any more amnesty bills, and it will also ensure that those who've
already emigrated get a fair shake from "the system".
|
