Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Journalism > News Media > Re: #The New Yo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 13308 of 15958
Post > Topic >>

Re: #The New Yorker: Is Keith Olbermann changing television news?

by Clay <clayonline@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 25, 2008 at 04:19 AM

On Jun 24, 6:48=A0pm, the stupidest poster on USENET, milt.shook, loves
when I kick his ass all over USENET  <LOL>:
                         ...

> On Jun 24, 1:11=A0pm, Clay <ClaysRi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 7:59 am, "Brian Carey" wrote:
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ...
>
> > > <milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >
>news:13e3c884-d259-4419-8d91-7b91772cc467@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Jun 23, 4:09 pm, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > <milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >
>news:29e92764-f9f4-46f4-a8c6-a0bf717c6a14@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > On Jun 23, 2:06 pm, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > "Sal Video" <svi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > > >news:jVO7k.11000$uE5.4321@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > > >news:c9qdnb_iRdogM8LVnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > >> "4095 Dead" <zepp22114...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > > >>news:nh7v54pfo553hbthkomq9jrirsrgnfl81m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > >>> The Political Scene
> > > > > >>> One Angry Man
> > > > > >>> Is Keith Olbermann changing TV news?
>
> > > > > >> Are his ratings 1/4th those of O'Reilly yet?
>
> > > > > > No they've never been that low. In fact he's surpassing him
now=
..
>
> > > > > Prove it. Good luck.
> > > > >Go to TV Newser. Click on ratings. They feature them every day.
In=
 the
> > > > >demo, O'Reilly only beats Olbermann by 15-20% most days. This
isn'=
t
> > > > >rocket science, Brian. Even you can check it out.
>
> > > > There is no "demo" mentioned in this part of the thread.
> > > >You said "ratings," you boob. As in "Are his ratings 1/4th those of
> > > >O'Reilly yet?" remember? It's above, after all.
>
> > > I'm sorry that you don't understand that ratings don't have to be
con=
fined
> > > to a particular demographic. =A0They can describe all viewers for a
g=
iven time
> > > slot.
>
> > > Let me know if you need more explanation.
>
> > I just readmilt.shook'sreply to this post.
>
> > Be easy on him... remember, he's pretty stupid.
>
> > -C-
>
> This coming from a guy who even makes the Stalker look like less of a
> moron. Well done, ****wit.

Steve has totally and completely humiliated your stupid ass,
milt.shook.

Every time he posts a progression of your lies and brain-injured
fantasies, you look like the fool you are.

Me, on the other hand... I kick your ass with facts and figures.

Just like I'm doing in this thread.

"Why is this night different from any other night, Father?"

Too ****ing funny.

-C-
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: #The New Yorker: Is Keith Olbermann changing television news
Clay <clayonline@[EMAI  2008-06-25 04:19:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 0:17:13 CST 2008.