On Jun 25, 6:43=A0am, Clay <clays0nl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 7:03=A0pm, the stupidest poster on USENET,milt.shook, sadly
> will always be just that =A0*sigh*:
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 1:25=A0pm, Clay <ClaysRi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 24, 1:14=A0pm,milt.shookjust doesn't get it <LOL>:
> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0...
>
> > > > On Jun 24, 7:57=A0am, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > <milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > >
>news:6789a967-e746-4ae4-b387-07388477f691@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > On Jun 23, 4:08 pm, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >>Are his ratings 1/4th those of O'Reilly yet?
>
> > > > > > > > Actually, he has surpassed O'Reilly in the target
demograph=
ic of 25-44
> > > > > > > > year olds,
>
> > > > > > > Oooooooooooh.... Thats gotta hurt?
>
> > > > > > > >and over all averages about 2/3rds of O'Reilly's viewer****p
> > > > > > > > these days.
>
> > > > > > > Really? Where did you read that?
> > > > > > >TV Newser posts the ratings every day, Brian. Do keep up.
> > > > > > >In the demo, Olbermann is barely 20% behind O'Reilly these
day=
s, on
> > > > > > >average.
>
> > > > >
>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/20/cable-news-ratings-for-thur=
sday-...
>
> > > > > > O'Reilly has more than twice the viewers that Olbermann has.
So=
rry.
>
> > > > > > Actually, no I'm not sorry.
> > > > > >I said the demo,you moron. No one cares about the part of the
au=
dience
> > > > > >who lives in front of the tv and never buys anything. In the
25-=
54
>
> > > > > Looks like you're the moron because the demo that Zepp cites
abov=
e is 25-44
> > > > > not 25-54.
>
> > > > Jesus, Brian, are you so desperate you're pointing to a typo?
>
> > > > > Doesn't matter anyway. =A0O'Reilly has more than twice the
viewer=
s of the
> > > > > Bush-hater.
>
> > > > Not of the people that matter.
>
> > > <http://tinyurl.com/54r85b>
>
> > > Tuesday Jun 24, 2008
> > > What's FNC Saying With This Ad?
>
> > > FOXNews Channel took out a print ad in this week's Advertising Age
> > > specifically promoting "The O'Reilly Factor", while taking a
Fox-esqu=
e
> > > shot at their competition. They crossed off several 8pmET shows sent
> > > to the cable graveyard, and boldly, partially crossed off the two
> > > competing shows still on the air.
>
> > > Click above to see the ad.
>
> > > -C-
>
> > And you think this is a positive sign from Fixed Noise?
>
> God, you're so stupid.
The obligatory third grade insult...
>
> It's positive that you are what you eat. =A0I call MSNBC... well, you
> know what I call them. =A0And you call FOXNews, "Fixed Noise"... just
> like your brain-dead master, Froth, tells you to.
Yeah, well, I used to call them Faux News, but I liked that one
better. I have NEVER called them "News" as a rule.
>
> And... for whatever reason, you truly feel that YOU are different.
I'm always different. I'm an individual. I think for myself. That's
why I don't need any news channel to tell me what I already know, and
reinforce my opinion. I disagree with Olbermann quite often. But I
respect his work, because he uses actual facts to sup****t his program,
unlike pretty much anyone at Faux. Hannity STILL insists the non-
existent Iraqi nukes are in Syria, for example, yet you rely on him
and the insane Orally for "news." And YOU brag about Fox's ratings,
because you are the one with the need to have his opinions validated.
>
> Now that's utter stupidity. =A0Don't you get that?
That's funny; I only came on here to correct the record. Brian asked
if Olbermann had 1/4 of O'Reilly's ratings yet. In the demo, Olbermann
has about 80% of the Factor's audience, and when you "factor" in that
Fox is available in more homes than MSNBC, because Murdoch strong-arms
the channel onto cable systems, even if they don't want it, and then
they insist that it be carried on the regular cable tier, they're
actually close to dead even. Did you know that Comcast has moved MSNBC
to its digital tier on some of its systems, for example? Murdoch would
never allow that; he would cut off FX, or refuse to allow the cable
company to carry Fox network programming if they did that.
>
> <ROTFLMFAO>
>
> > I hate to break it to you, Junior, but this is the first sign of
> > panic.
>
> Bragging about disposing of the competition is "panic"?
Yes. Of course it is. What other reason would they have? And the
partial cutoff of Countdown is a joke. The ratings are still RISING;
why would they kill off the first program that has competed with
O'Reilly in 10 years? It's a sign of panic. There's no other reason to
mention it...
>
> See how stupid you are,milt.shook?
I see how gullible and stupid you are, Clay.
>
> > When someone in the media tell you about the ***** they USED to
> > kick, that's panic. Put it this way.... of the shows on the MSNBC
> > list, Olbermann's has lasted the longest (5 years) and is the only one
> > that has trended UP for most of its run.
>
> This, my stupid USENET poster, is what's called "tweaking the nose" of
> the competition. =A0FOXNews did not say that they've destroyed Froth...
> just that Froth is frustrated that he cannot beat his master.
You don't tweak the nose of the competition unless they're breathing
down your neck.
And no one expected Olbermann to ever beat O'Reilly. That it's
competitive is a surprise to everyone, including me. Fox has a loyal
audience, and no one should expect their ratings to drop by any great
degree. The fact that Olbermann is increasing his audience so
significantly is a pleasant surprise.
>
> Hmmm... if Bill O'Reilly is Froth's master and Froth is your master...
>
> Do the math, stupid.
I'm doing the math. Olbermann had about 1/3 O'Reilly's audience three
years ago. He now averages about 80% of O'Reilly's audience. Like I
said, it's a nice surprise. It shows there actually is an audience of
people who like to think about ****, and don't want to be force-fed
propaganda. And that audience continues to grow rapidly, while Fox's
audience will continue to die off over the next ten years.
|
