On Jun 25, 7:19=A0am, Clay <clayonl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 6:48=A0pm, the stupidest poster on USENET,milt.shook, loves
> when I kick his ass all over USENET =A0<LOL>:
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 1:11=A0pm, Clay <ClaysRi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 24, 7:59 am, "Brian Carey" wrote:
> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ...
>
> > > > <milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >
>news:13e3c884-d259-4419-8d91-7b91772cc467@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > On Jun 23, 4:09 pm, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > <milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > >
>news:29e92764-f9f4-46f4-a8c6-a0bf717c6a14@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > On Jun 23, 2:06 pm, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > "Sal Video" <svi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > > > >news:jVO7k.11000$uE5.4321@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > > > >news:c9qdnb_iRdogM8LVnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > >> "4095 Dead" <zepp22114...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
> > > > > > >>news:nh7v54pfo553hbthkomq9jrirsrgnfl81m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > >>> The Political Scene
> > > > > > >>> One Angry Man
> > > > > > >>> Is Keith Olbermann changing TV news?
>
> > > > > > >> Are his ratings 1/4th those of O'Reilly yet?
>
> > > > > > > No they've never been that low. In fact he's surpassing him
n=
ow.
>
> > > > > > Prove it. Good luck.
> > > > > >Go to TV Newser. Click on ratings. They feature them every day.
=
In the
> > > > > >demo, O'Reilly only beats Olbermann by 15-20% most days. This
is=
n't
> > > > > >rocket science, Brian. Even you can check it out.
>
> > > > > There is no "demo" mentioned in this part of the thread.
> > > > >You said "ratings," you boob. As in "Are his ratings 1/4th those
o=
f
> > > > >O'Reilly yet?" remember? It's above, after all.
>
> > > > I'm sorry that you don't understand that ratings don't have to be
c=
onfined
> > > > to a particular demographic. =A0They can describe all viewers for
a=
given time
> > > > slot.
>
> > > > Let me know if you need more explanation.
>
> > > I just readmilt.shook'sreply to this post.
>
> > > Be easy on him... remember, he's pretty stupid.
>
> > > -C-
>
> > This coming from a guy who even makes the Stalker look like less of a
> > moron. Well done, ****wit.
>
> Steve has totally and completely humiliated your stupid ass,milt.shook.
The stalker only humiliates himself, ****tard. That you buy into it
should humiliate you.
>
> Every time he posts a progression of your lies and brain-injured
> fantasies, you look like the fool you are.
>
> Me, on the other hand... I kick your ass with facts and figures.
>
> Just like I'm doing in this thread.
Really? You've "studied" Arbitrons and Arbitrends for years, yet you
don't know they include very detailed data with regard to incomes and
educational levels of the audience? The only ass you've ever kicked is
your own...
|
