On Jun 25, 8:29=A0am, milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Jun 25, 6:43=A0am, Clay <clays0nl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 7:03=A0pm, the stupidest poster on USENET,milt.shook, sadly
> > will always be just that =A0*sigh*:
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0...
>
> > > On Jun 24, 1:25=A0pm, Clay <ClaysRi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 24, 1:14=A0pm,milt.shookjust doesn't get it <LOL>:
> > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0...
>
> > > > > On Jun 24, 7:57=A0am, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
>
> > > > > > <milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > > >
>news:6789a967-e746-4ae4-b387-07388477f691@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > On Jun 23, 4:08 pm, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
>
> > > > > > > > >>Are his ratings 1/4th those of O'Reilly yet?
>
> > > > > > > > > Actually, he has surpassed O'Reilly in the target
demogra=
phic of 25-44
> > > > > > > > > year olds,
>
> > > > > > > > Oooooooooooh.... Thats gotta hurt?
>
> > > > > > > > >and over all averages about 2/3rds of O'Reilly's
viewer****=
p
> > > > > > > > > these days.
>
> > > > > > > > Really? Where did you read that?
> > > > > > > >TV Newser posts the ratings every day, Brian. Do keep up.
> > > > > > > >In the demo, Olbermann is barely 20% behind O'Reilly these
d=
ays, on
> > > > > > > >average.
>
> > > > > >
>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/06/20/cable-news-ratings-for-th=
ursday-...
>
> > > > > > > O'Reilly has more than twice the viewers that Olbermann has.
=
Sorry.
>
> > > > > > > Actually, no I'm not sorry.
> > > > > > >I said the demo,you moron. No one cares about the part of the
=
audience
> > > > > > >who lives in front of the tv and never buys anything. In the
2=
5-54
>
> > > > > > Looks like you're the moron because the demo that Zepp cites
ab=
ove is 25-44
> > > > > > not 25-54.
>
> > > > > Jesus, Brian, are you so desperate you're pointing to a typo?
>
> > > > > > Doesn't matter anyway. =A0O'Reilly has more than twice the
view=
ers of the
> > > > > > Bush-hater.
>
> > > > > Not of the people that matter.
>
> > > > <http://tinyurl.com/54r85b>
>
> > > > Tuesday Jun 24, 2008
> > > > What's FNC Saying With This Ad?
>
> > > > FOXNews Channel took out a print ad in this week's Advertising Age
> > > > specifically promoting "The O'Reilly Factor", while taking a
Fox-es=
que
> > > > shot at their competition. They crossed off several 8pmET shows
sen=
t
> > > > to the cable graveyard, and boldly, partially crossed off the two
> > > > competing shows still on the air.
>
> > > > Click above to see the ad.
>
> > > > -C-
>
> > > And you think this is a positive sign from Fixed Noise?
>
> > God, you're so stupid.
>
> The obligatory third grade insult...
>
>
>
> > It's positive that you are what you eat. =A0I call MSNBC... well, you
> > know what I call them. =A0And you call FOXNews, "Fixed Noise"... just
> > like your brain-dead master, Froth, tells you to.
>
> Yeah, well, I used to call them Faux News, but I liked that one
> better. I have NEVER called them "News" as a rule.
>
>
>
> > And... for whatever reason, you truly feel that YOU are different.
>
> I'm always different. I'm an individual. I think for myself. That's
> why I don't need any news channel to tell me what I already know, and
> reinforce my opinion. I disagree with Olbermann quite often. But I
> respect his work, because he uses actual facts to sup****t his program,
> unlike pretty much anyone at Faux. Hannity STILL insists the non-
> existent Iraqi nukes are in Syria, for example, yet you rely on him
> and the insane Orally for "news." And YOU brag about Fox's ratings,
> because you are the one with the need to have his opinions validated.
>
>
>
> > Now that's utter stupidity. =A0Don't you get that?
>
> That's funny; I only came on here to correct the record. Brian asked
> if Olbermann had 1/4 of O'Reilly's ratings yet. In the demo, Olbermann
> has about 80% of the Factor's audience, and when you "factor" in that
> Fox is available in more homes than MSNBC, because Murdoch strong-arms
> the channel onto cable systems, even if they don't want it, and then
> they insist that it be carried on the regular cable tier, they're
> actually close to dead even. Did you know that Comcast has moved MSNBC
> to its digital tier on some of its systems, for example? Murdoch would
> never allow that; he would cut off FX, or refuse to allow the cable
> company to carry Fox network programming if they did that.
>
>
>
> > <ROTFLMFAO>
>
> > > I hate to break it to you, Junior, but this is the first sign of
> > > panic.
>
> > Bragging about disposing of the competition is "panic"?
>
> Yes. Of course it is. What other reason would they have? And the
> partial cutoff of Countdown is a joke. The ratings are still RISING;
> why would they kill off the first program that has competed with
> O'Reilly in 10 years? It's a sign of panic. There's no other reason to
> mention it...
>
>
>
> > See how stupid you are,milt.shook?
>
> I see how gullible and stupid you are, Clay.
>
>
>
> > > When someone in the media tell you about the ***** they USED to
> > > kick, that's panic. Put it this way.... of the shows on the MSNBC
> > > list, Olbermann's has lasted the longest (5 years) and is the only
on=
e
> > > that has trended UP for most of its run.
>
> > This, my stupid USENET poster, is what's called "tweaking the nose" of
> > the competition. =A0FOXNews did not say that they've destroyed
Froth...
> > just that Froth is frustrated that he cannot beat his master.
>
> You don't tweak the nose of the competition unless they're breathing
> down your neck.
>
> And no one expected Olbermann to ever beat O'Reilly. That it's
> competitive is a surprise to everyone, including me. Fox has a loyal
> audience, and no one should expect their ratings to drop by any great
> degree. The fact that Olbermann is increasing his audience so
> significantly is a pleasant surprise.
>
>
>
> > Hmmm... if Bill O'Reilly is Froth's master and Froth is your master...
>
> > Do the math, stupid.
>
> I'm doing the math. Olbermann had about 1/3 O'Reilly's audience three
> years ago. He now averages about 80% of O'Reilly's audience. Like I
> said, it's a nice surprise. It shows there actually is an audience of
> people who like to think about ****, and don't want to be force-fed
> propaganda. And that audience continues to grow rapidly, while Fox's
> audience will continue to die off over the next ten years.- Hide quoted
t=
ext -
>
> - Show quoted text -
In the event of an Obama presidency angry white people who fancy
themselves oppressed will coalesce around O'Reilly and Limbaugh like
white blood cells around staph infections.
|
