On Jun 25, 9:46=A0am, milt.shook, the leftist liar (and the stupidest
poster on USENET)... lies again <LOL>:
...
> On Jun 25, 7:19=A0am, Clay <clayonl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 6:48=A0pm, the stupidest poster on USENET,milt.shook, loves
> > when I kick his ass all over USENET =A0<LOL>:
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0...
>
> > > On Jun 24, 1:11=A0pm, Clay <ClaysRi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 24, 7:59 am, "Brian Carey" wrote:
> > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ...
>
> > > > > <milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > >
>news:13e3c884-d259-4419-8d91-7b91772cc467@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > On Jun 23, 4:09 pm, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > <milt.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > > >
>news:29e92764-f9f4-46f4-a8c6-a0bf717c6a14@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > On Jun 23, 2:06 pm, "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
>
> > > > > > > "Sal Video" <svi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > > > > >news:jVO7k.11000$uE5.4321@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > > "Brian Carey" <car...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > > > > >news:c9qdnb_iRdogM8LVnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > >> "4095 Dead" <zepp22114...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messa=
ge
> > > > > > > >>news:nh7v54pfo553hbthkomq9jrirsrgnfl81m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > >>> The Political Scene
> > > > > > > >>> One Angry Man
> > > > > > > >>> Is Keith Olbermann changing TV news?
>
> > > > > > > >> Are his ratings 1/4th those of O'Reilly yet?
>
> > > > > > > > No they've never been that low. In fact he's surpassing
him=
now.
>
> > > > > > > Prove it. Good luck.
> > > > > > >Go to TV Newser. Click on ratings. They feature them every
day=
.. In the
> > > > > > >demo, O'Reilly only beats Olbermann by 15-20% most days. This
=
isn't
> > > > > > >rocket science, Brian. Even you can check it out.
>
> > > > > > There is no "demo" mentioned in this part of the thread.
> > > > > >You said "ratings," you boob. As in "Are his ratings 1/4th
those=
of
> > > > > >O'Reilly yet?" remember? It's above, after all.
>
> > > > > I'm sorry that you don't understand that ratings don't have to
be=
confined
> > > > > to a particular demographic. =A0They can describe all viewers
for=
a given time
> > > > > slot.
>
> > > > > Let me know if you need more explanation.
>
> > > > I just readmilt.shook'sreply to this post.
>
> > > > Be easy on him... remember, he's pretty stupid.
>
> > > > -C-
>
> > > This coming from a guy who even makes the Stalker look like less of
a
> > > moron. Well done, ****wit.
>
> > Steve has totally and completely humiliated your stupid
ass,milt.shook.
>
> The stalker only humiliates himself, ****tard. That you buy into it
> should humiliate you.
HAHAHAHAHAHA... he has demonstrated (with YOUR OWN WORDS) how much of
a liar and really pretty sick creator of fantasy you are, milt.shook.
<LOL>
> > Every time he posts a progression of your lies and brain-injured
> > fantasies, you look like the fool you are.
>
> > Me, on the other hand... I kick your ass with facts and figures.
>
> > Just like I'm doing in this thread.
>
> Really? You've "studied" Arbitrons and Arbitrends for years, yet you
> don't know they include very detailed data with regard to incomes and
> educational levels of the audience?
Liar... that's not what I said, ****-for-brains.
> The only ass you've ever kicked is your own...
You have to lie (about yourself) to make yourself feel im****tant,
milt.shook.
The review YOU wrote about that piece-of-**** failure essay (that you
think was a book) is enough to clinch that.
Too ****ing funny.
-C-
|
